4.6 Article

An analysis of the drought in Yunnan, China, from a perspective of society drought severity

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages 431-458

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-013-0572-7

Keywords

Drought; Spatial variability; Temporal trend; China; Water resource

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2009SD-20]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20090003120016]
  3. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control [10K05ESPCT]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drought disaster management entails not only understanding meteorological drought as a natural hazard but also evaluating the adverse societal impacts related to the economy and human lives. For the purpose of quantifying the drought severity from the perspective of society drought, a drought index, namely Society Drought Severity Index (SDSI), was put forward to analyze the drought in Yunnan Province of China. In SDSI for Yunnan, the drought severity was represented by the weighted discrepancy between the appropriate water needs and the total available water resources, inspired by the established Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI). Technically, the trend in historical water consumption records in agricultural, industrial, and domestic sectors was applied to represent the appropriate water needs; an apparent runoff was used to represent the available water resource in Yunnan. The SDSI of Yunnan revealed a trend toward increasing drought severity, which resulted from a combination of meteorological changes and water needs escalation. Moreover, the spatial center of the 2010 drought in Yunnan based on SDSI was different from that identified by PDSI, which exactly reflected the influence of water needs on drought severity. The SDSI was deemed to be a beneficial tool for drought disaster management and drought risk governance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available