4.6 Article

Comparative study using spheres, rods and spindle-shaped nanoplatelets on dispersion stability, dissolution and toxicity of CuO nanomaterials

Journal

NANOTOXICOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 422-432

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2013.796017

Keywords

nanoparticles; copper oxide; dissolution; shapes; nanotoxicology

Funding

  1. QNano Project from the European Community Research Infrastructures under the FP7 Capacities Programme [262163]
  2. European Community [CP-FP 214478-2]
  3. MRC [G0700926] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0700926] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Copper oxide nanoparticles with different shapes were used to examine the effect of shape on the various physicochemical properties (reactivity, aggregation, suspension stability) and to examine the behaviour by which CuO nanoparticles exhibit their biological response towards alveolar type-I cells. The different shapes examined in this study include spherical-, rod- and spindle-shaped platelet particles. In vitro dissolution studies (7 days) in 1 mM NaNO3 matrix showed a marked difference in dissolved Cu release between the nanoparticles. However, in serum-free cell-culture media (exposure media to cells), the particles' dissolution was found to be significantly enhanced with close to complete dissolution reported for all particle types. Biological studies showed both shape and size of the CuO nanoparticles tested to have a significant effect on TT-1 cell viability and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8. This study shows a complex interplay between particulate and dissolved species triggering the biological response. Upon immediate exposure of CuO nanoparticles of different shapes, the particulate form contributes towards the toxicity. However, for any biological response observed over and beyond a period of 24 h, the dissolved fraction becomes significant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available