4.6 Article

Nanotoxicology using the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis: from developmental toxicity to genotoxicology

Journal

NANOTOXICOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 508-520

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2013.802386

Keywords

Nematostella vectensis; quantum dots; quantum rods; embryotoxicology; teratogenesis

Funding

  1. NanoSciEranet project, NANOTRUCK
  2. Ministry of Foreign Affair Italy - ITALY-ISRAEL Joint Innovation Program for scientific and Technological cooperation in RD
  3. NANOTRUCK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Concomitant with the fast-growing advances in the synthesis and engineering of colloidal nanocrystals, an urgent evaluation of their toxicity on human beings and environment is strongly encouraged by public health organisations. Despite the in vitro approaches employed for toxicological screening of hazardous compounds, the use of simple and cost-effective living organisms may enormously contribute to solve unanswered questions related to embryotoxic and teratogenic effects of nanomaterials. Here, the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (Cnidaria, Anthozoa) is presented as a novel model organism to profile bio/non-bio interactions and to show a comprehensive toxicological analysis performed on embryos, larvae and adults treated with fluorescent cadmium-based nanocrystals. Spanning from in vivo biodistribution to molecular investigations, different behaviours and effects depending on the composition and surface coatings are showed. Rod-shaped cadmium selenide/cadmium sulfide (CdSe/CdS) nanocrystals resulted in excellent imaging probes to track N. vectensis development with negligible adverse effects, while spherical CdTe nanocrystals severely impaired embryogenesis, resulting in aberrant phenotypes and deregulation of developmental genes, which raise severe worries for a safe use of this type of nanoparticles for human purposes and environmental contamination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available