4.6 Article

Respiratory epithelial cytotoxicity and membrane damage (holes) caused by amine-modified nanoparticles

Journal

NANOTOXICOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 94-108

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2011.558643

Keywords

Nano-scale imaging; alveolar epithelial; nanotoxicity; amine-modified nanoparticles; cell membrane damage

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council of United Kingdom (MRC) [G0700926]
  2. NIHR Respiratory Disease Bio-medical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
  3. Imperial College London
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D020875/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [G0700926, G0801056B] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H012893/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. BBSRC [BB/D020875/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [G0700926] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. NERC [NE/H012893/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The respiratory epithelium is a significant target of inhaled, nano-sized particles, the biological reactivity of which will depend on its physicochemical properties. Surface-modified, 50 and 100 nm, polystyrene latex nanoparticles (NPs) were used as model particles to examine the effect of particle size and surface chemistry on transformed human alveolar epithelial type 1-like cells (TT1). Live images of TT1 exposed to amine-modified NPs taken by hopping probe ion conductance microscopy revealed severe damage and holes on cell membranes that were not observed with other types of NPs. This paralleled induction of cell detachment, cytotoxicity and apoptotic (caspase-3/7 and caspase-9) cell death, and increased release of CXCL8 (IL-8). In contrast, unmodified, carboxyl-modified 50 nm NPs and the 100 nm NPs did not cause membrane damage, and were less reactive. Thus, the susceptibility and membrane damage to respiratory epithelium following inhalation of NPs will depend on both surface chemistry (e.g., cationic) and nano-size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available