4.6 Article

Stem cell-mediated delivery of SPIO-loaded gold nanoparticles for the theranosis of liver injury and hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 40, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/25/40/405101

Keywords

stem cell; superparamagnetic iron oxide; gold nanoparticle; magnetic resonance imaging; liver injury

Funding

  1. John S Dunn Foundation
  2. MD Anderson Cancer Center's Odyssey Fellowship
  3. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center [CA016672]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The treatment of liver injuries or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been hindered by the lack of efficient drug delivery. Even with the help of nanoparticles or other synthetic delivering agents, a large portion of the dose is still sequestered in the reticuloendothelial system. As an alternative, adipose-derived mesenchymal cells (AD-MSCs), which have the capability of homing to the injured liver, can be used as a unique carrier for theranostic agents. Theranostic agents must have the capacity for being non-toxic to host cells during transportation, and for timely activation once they arrive at the injury sites. In this study, we loaded AD-MSCs with superparamagnetic iron oxide-coated gold nanoparticles (SPIO@ AuNPs) and tested their effects against liver injury and HCC in cells and in mice. SPIO@ AuNP is a non-toxic magnetic resonance (MR)-active contrast agent that can generate heat when irradiated with near-infrared laser. Our results showed that SPIO@ AuNPs were successfully transfected into AD-MSCs without compromising either cell viability (P > 0.05) or cell differentiability. In vivo MR imaging and histologic analysis confirmed the active homing of AD-MSCs. Upon laser irradiation, the SPIO@ AuNP-loaded AD-MSCs could thermally ablate surrounding HCC tumor cells. SPIO@ AuNP-loaded AD-MSCs proved a promising theranostic approach for injured liver and HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available