4.6 Article

Interfacial magnetism and exchange coupling in BiFeO3-CuO nanocomposite

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 50, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/50/505711

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India [03(1210)/12/EMR-II]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ferromagnetic BiFeO3 nanocrystals of average size 9 nm were used to form a composite with antiferromagnetic CuO nanosheets, with the composition (x) BiFeO3/(100 - x )CuO, x D 0, 20, 40, 50, 60, 80 and 100. The dispersion of BiFeO3 nanocrystals into the CuO matrix was confirmed by x-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. The ferromagnetic ordering as observed in pure BiFeO3 occurs mainly due to the reduction in the particle size as compared to the wavelength (62 nm) of the spiral modulated spin structure of the bulk BiFeO3. Surface spin disorder of BiFeO3 nanocrystals gives rise to an exponential behavior of magnetization with temperature. Strong magnetic exchange coupling between the BiFeO3 nanocrystal and the CuO matrix induces an interfacial superparamagnetic phase with a blocking temperature of about 80 K. Zero field and field cooled magnetizations are analyzed by a ferromagnetic core and disordered spin shell model. The temperature dependence of the calculated saturation magnetization exhibits three magnetic contributions in three temperature regimes. The BiFeO3/CuO nanocomposites reveal an exchange bias effect below 170 K. The maximum exchange bias field HEB is 1841 Oe for x D 50 at 5 K under field cooling of 50 kOe. The exchange bias coupling results in an increase of coercivity of 1934 Oe at 5 K. Blocked spins within an interfacial region give rise to a remarkable exchange bias effect in the nanocomposite due to strong magnetic exchange coupling between the BiFeO3 nanocrystals and the CuO nanosheets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available