4.6 Article

Metal on metal oxide nanowire Co-catalyzed Si photocathode for solar water splitting

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/19/194013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG36-08G018016]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF ARRA) [ECCS0901113]
  3. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [0901113] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a systematic study of Si vertical bar ZnO and Si vertical bar ZnO vertical bar metal photocathodes for effective photoelectrochemical cells and hydrogen generation. Both ZnO nanocrystalline thin films and vertical nanowire arrays were studied. Si vertical bar ZnO electrodes showed increased cathodic photocurrents due to improved charge separation by the formation of a p/n junction, and Si vertical bar ZnO:Al (n(+)-ZnO) and Si vertical bar ZnO(N-2) (thin films prepared in N-2/Ar gas) lead to a further increase in cathodic photocurrents. Si vertical bar ZnONW (nanowire array) photocathodes dramatically increased the photocurrents and thus photoelectrochemical conversion efficiency due to the enhanced light absorption and enlarged surface area. The ZnO film thickness and ZnO nanowire length were important to the enhancements. A thin metal coating on ZnO showed increased photocurrent due to a catalyzed hydrogen evolution reaction and Ni metal showed comparable catalytic activities to those of Pt and Pd. Moreover, photoelectrochemical instability of Si vertical bar ZnO electrodes was minimized by metal co-catalysts. Our results indicate that the metal and ZnO on p-type Si serve as co-catalysts for photoelectrochemical water splitting, which can provide a possible low-cost and scalable method to fabricate high efficiency photocathodes for practical applications in clean solar energy harvesting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available