4.6 Article

Crystalline nanotubes of γ-AlOOH and γ-Al2O3: hydrothermal synthesis, formation mechanism and catalytic performance

Journal

NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/21/215604

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20773065, 20773062, 20403008]
  2. National Basic Research (973) Program of China [2007CB936302]
  3. Hi-tech Research and Development Program of China [2006AA020101]
  4. Modern Analysis Center of Nanjing University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crystalline nanotubes of gamma-AlOOH and gamma-Al2O3 have been synthesized. An anionic surfactant-assisted hydrothermal process yields gamma-AlOOH nanotubes, and appropriate calcination treatment of the gamma-AlOOH nanotubes yields gamma-Al2O3 nanotubes. The nanotubes were characterized by XRD, SEM, TEM, TG-DSC, FTIR and nitrogen adsorption-desorption techniques. Both the gamma-AlOOH and gamma-Al2O3 nanotubes are crystalline, with a representative length of similar to 500 nm and diameters of 20-40 nm. The gamma-Al2O3 nanotubes exhibit a very high mesoporous specific surface area (SSA) of 201.0 m(2) g(-1) and a high mesopore volume of 0.68 cm(3) g(-1) with an average mesopore size of 27.7 nm, as well as a high microporous SSA of 186.0 m(2) g(-1) and a micropore volume of 0.08 cm(3) g(-1) with an average micropore size of 0.53 nm. The formation process was discussed and a possible mechanism was proposed, in which a lamellar phase was first formed by camphorsulfonic anions and Al(III) species, and then rolled up to form the crystalline nanotubes under the hydrothermal condition. The catalytic performance of the obtained gamma-Al2O3 nanotubes was tested by using the dehydration of ethanol to ethylene as a probe reaction and it was shown that the obtained gamma-Al2O3 nanotubes catalyst possesses a higher catalytic activity compared with the gamma-Al2O3 nanoparticles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available