4.8 Article

Three-dimensional metal/oxide nanocone arrays for high-performance electrochemical pseudocapacitors

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 3626-3631

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3nr06675d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. HK-RGC General Research Funds (GRF) [HKUST 605710, 604809, 612111]
  2. Hong Kong Innovation Technology Commission [ITS/192/11]
  3. HKUST Research Project Competition Grant [RPC11EG38]
  4. NSFC [21303251]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-dimensional (3D) electrodes are critical for enabling high-performance power sources. We report here on the design and fabrication, by combining imprint and soft-printing technologies, of 3D nanocone arrays as a novel platform for high performance pseudocapacitors. Such purpose-built 3D nanocone arrays have the advantages of simplicity/versatility/reliability of fabrication, generality to a vast range of active materials, high electrode surface area, and ease of electrolyte permeation. As a demonstration of principle, Au and MnO2 were sequentially deposited forming a 3D Au/MnOx nanocone array electrode for a pseudocapacitor device. This device achieved a specific mass (areal) capacitance of 840.3 F g(-1) (88.2 mF cm(-2)) at a current density of 2 A g(-1). Additionally, the asymmetric supercapacitor using the Au/MnOx nanocone array as the positive electrode and a carbon-based material as the negative electrode achieved a capacitance of 108.5 F g(-1) at a current density of 1 A g(-1), corresponding to an energy density of as high as 46.8 W h kg(-1) at a power density of 0.72 kW kg(-1). The cell still preserved 96.5% of the initial capacitance even after 2000 cycles at a current density of 2 A g(-1). The initial result is at least on a par with those of the best asymmetric supercapacitors reported so far, and thus bolsters the development value of the conductive nanocone arrays for high-performance supercapacitors and other energy-storage devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available