4.8 Article

The atomistic mechanism of carbon nanotube cutting catalyzed by nickel under an electron beam

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 6, Issue 24, Pages 14877-14890

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4nr05006a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation of Basic Research [14-02-00739-a]
  2. Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme [PIIF-GA-2012-326435 RespSpatDisp]
  3. Grupos Consolidados del Gobierno Vasco [IT-578-13]
  4. European Research Council (ERC)
  5. Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cutting of single-walled carbon nanotubes by an 80 keV electron beam catalyzed by nickel clusters is imaged in situ using aberration-corrected high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Extensive molecular dynamics simulations within the CompuTEM approach provide insight into the mechanism of this process and demonstrate that the combination of irradiation and the nickel catalyst is crucial for the cutting process to take place. The atomistic mechanism of cutting is revealed by a detailed analysis of irradiation-induced reactions of bond reorganization and atom ejection in the vicinity of the nickel cluster, showing a highly complex interplay of different chemical transformations catalysed by the metal cluster. One of the most prevalent pathways includes three consecutive stages: formation of polyyne carbon chains from the carbon nanotube, dissociation of the carbon chains into single and pairs of adatoms adsorbed on the nickel cluster, and ejection of these adatoms leading to the cutting of the nanotube. Significant variations in the atom ejection rate are discovered depending on the process stage and nanotube diameter. The revealed mechanism and kinetic characteristics of the cutting process provide fundamental knowledge for the development of new methodologies for control and manipulation of carbon structures at the nanoscale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available