4.8 Article

Binder free three-dimensional sulphur/few-layer graphene foam cathode with enhanced high-rate capability for rechargeable lithium sulphur batteries

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 5746-5753

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4nr00326h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cambridge Commonwealth Trust
  2. ERC [279342, 259619 PHOTO EM]
  3. EPSRC [EP/K016636/1]
  4. [EP/H047565/1]
  5. EPSRC [EP/H047565/1, EP/K016636/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H047565/1, EP/K016636/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel ultra-lightweight three-dimensional (3-D) cathode system for lithium sulphur (Li-S) batteries has been synthesised by loading sulphur on to an interconnected 3-D network of few-layered graphene (FLG) via a sulphur solution infiltration method. A free-standing FLG monolithic network foam was formed as a negative of a Ni metallic foam template by CVD followed by etching away of Ni. The FLG foam offers excellent electrical conductivity, an appropriate hierarchical pore structure for containing the electro-active sulphur and facilitates rapid electron/ion transport. This cathode system does not require any additional binding agents, conductive additives or a separate metallic current collector thus decreasing the weight of the cathode by typically similar to 20-30 wt%. A Li-S battery with the sulphur-FLG foam cathode shows good electrochemical stability and high rate discharge capacity retention for up to 400 discharge/charge cycles at a high current density of 3200 mA g(-1). Even after 400 cycles the capacity decay is only similar to 0.064% per cycle relative to the early (e.g. the 5th cycle) discharge capacity, while yielding an average columbic efficiency of similar to 96.2%. Our results indicate the potential suitability of graphene foam for efficient, ultra-light and high-performance batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available