4.8 Article

Polarization properties of fluorescent BSA protected Au25 nanoclusters

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 5, Issue 8, Pages 3441-3446

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3nr34152f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01EB12003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BSA protected gold nanoclusters (Au-25) are attracting a great deal of attention due to their unique spectroscopic properties and possible use in biophysical applications. Although there are reports on synthetic strategies, spectroscopy and applications, little is known about their polarization behavior. In this study, we synthesized the BSA protected Au-25 nanoclusters and studied their steady state and time resolved fluorescence properties including polarization behavior in different solvents: glycerol, propylene glycol and water. We demonstrated that the nanocluster absorption spectrum can be separated from the extinction spectrum by subtraction of Rayleigh scattering. The nanocluster absorption spectrum is well approximated by three Gaussian components. By a comparison of the emissions from BSA Au-25 clusters and rhodamine B in water, we estimated the quantum yield of nanoclusters to be higher than 0.06. The fluorescence lifetime of BSA Au-25 clusters is long and heterogeneous with an average value of 1.84 mu s. In glycerol at -20 degrees C the anisotropy is high, reaching a value of 0.35. However, the excitation anisotropy strongly depends on the excitation wavelengths indicating a significant overlap of the different transition moments. The anisotropy decay in water reveals a correlation time below 0.2 mu s. In propylene glycol the measured correlation time is longer and the initial anisotropy depends on the excitation wavelength. BSA Au-25 clusters, due to long lifetime and high polarization, can potentially be used in studying large macromolecules such as protein complexes with large molecular weight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available