4.6 Article

Meta-analysis of inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability of liposomal and non-liposomal anticancer agents

Journal

NANOMEDICINE-NANOTECHNOLOGY BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 109-117

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2013.07.005

Keywords

CKD-602; S-CKD602; Pharmacokinetic; Variability; Sampling schema; Liposomes

Funding

  1. ALZA Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the inter-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of liposomal and small molecule (SM) anticancer agents. Inter-patient PK variability of 9 liposomal and SM formulations of the same drug was evaluated. PK variability was measured as coefficient of variance (CV%) of area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and the fold-difference between AUC(max) and AUC(min) (AUC range). CV% of AUC and AUC ranges were 2.7-fold (P < 0.001) and 16.7-fold (P = 0.13) greater, respectively, for liposomal compared with SM drugs. There was an inverse linear relationship between the clearance (CL) of liposomal agents and PK variability with a lower CL associated with greater PK variability (R-2 = 0.39). PK variability of liposomal agents was greater when evaluated from 0-336 h compared with 0-24 h. PK variability of liposomes is significantly greater than SM. The factors associated with the PK variability of liposomal agents need to be evaluated. From the Clinical Editor: In this meta-analysis, the inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability of 9 liposomal and small molecule anti-cancer agents was studied. The authors determined that several parameters are in favor of the liposomal formulation; however, the PK variability of the formulation was higher compared with small molecule agents, the reason for which remains to be determined in future studies. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available