4.6 Article

A comparison of changes to doxorubicin pharmacokinetics, antitumor activity, and toxicity mediated by PEGylated dendrimer and PEGylated liposome drug delivery systems

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2011.05.013

Keywords

Dendrimer; Liposome; Doxorubicin; Drug targeting; Enhanced permeation and retention

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council
  2. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and antitumor efficacy of three doxorubicin formulations (doxorubicin in saline, conjugated to a polylysine dendrimer, and encapsulated within a stealth liposome) were investigated in Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats. Liposomal and dendrimer-based delivery systems resulted in more prolonged plasma exposure of total doxorubicin when compared to administration of doxorubicin in saline, although concentrations of free doxorubicin remained low in both cases. Biodistribution profiles revealed enhanced accumulation of dendrimer-and liposome-associated doxorubicin in tumors when compared to doxorubicin alone, although all three doxorubicin formulations reduced tumor growth to a similar extent. Markers of systemic toxicity (spleen weight, white blood cell counts, body weight, and cardiotoxicity) were more pronounced in rats that received doxorubicin and liposomal doxorubicin when compared to dendrimer-doxorubicin. The data provide preliminary evidence that dendrimer-doxorubicin displays similar antitumor efficacy to PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin, but with lower systemic toxicity (resulting from reduced drug exposure to nontarget organs). From the Clinical Editor: In this manuscript, three different doxorubicin preparations are compared and preliminary evidence suggests that dendrimer-doxorubicin displays similar antitumor efficacy to PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin, but with lower systemic toxicity. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available