4.6 Article

Self-assembly and liver targeting of sulfated chitosan nanoparticles functionalized with glycyrrhetinic acid

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2011.11.002

Keywords

Sulfated chitosan; Glycyrrhetinic acid; Polymeric micelles; Drug delivery; Liver targeting

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50873048, 51073080]
  2. Key Project of Scientific and Technical Supporting Programs of Tianjin [10ZCKFSY07500]
  3. State Key Fundamental R and D Project [2011CB606202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A drug carrier based on glycyrrhetinic acid-modified sulfated chitosan (GA-SCTS) was synthesized. The glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) acted as both a hydrophobic group and a liver-targeting ligand. The GA-SCTS micelles displayed rapid and significant ability to target the liver in vivo. The IC50 for doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded GA-SCTS micelles (DOX/SA-SCTS micelles) against HepG2 cells was 54.7 ng/mL, which was extremely lower than the amount of no-GA-modified DOX-loaded micelles. In addition, DOX/SA-SCTS micelles could target specifically the liver cancer cells. They had higher affinity for the liver cancer cells (HepG2 cells) than for the normal liver cells (Chang liver cells). There was nearly 2.18-fold improvement in uptake of the DOX/SA-SCTS micelles by HepG2 cells than that by Chang liver cells. These results indicate that GA-SCTS is not only an excellent carrier for drugs, but also a potential vehicle for liver-cancer targeting. From the Clinical Editor: In this basic science study, sulfated chitosan nanoparticles were functionalized with glycyrrhetinic acid and studied in cell cultures, demonstrating efficient self-assembly and targeting of liver pathology. In vivo demonstration for the same is also provided, paving the way to future studies establishing long-term effects, toxicity and potential clinical applicability. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available