4.7 Review

Shaping cancer nanomedicine: the effect of particle shape on the in vivo journey of nanoparticles

Journal

NANOMEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 121-134

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.13.191

Keywords

biodistribution; cancer; margination; nanomedicine; nanoparticle shape; phagocytosis; targeting avidity; transport of nanoparticle

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [1R01CA177716]
  2. Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Cleveland [UL1TR000439]
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences component of the NIH
  4. Ohio Cancer Research Associates
  5. NIH Interdisciplinary Biomedical Imaging Training Program [5T32EB007509]
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA177716] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR000439] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [T32EB007509] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent advances in nanoparticle technology have enabled the fabrication of nanoparticle classes with unique sizes, shapes and materials, which in turn has facilitated major advancements in the field of nanomedicine. More specifically, in the last decade, nanoscientists have recognized that nanomedicine exhibits a highly engineerable nature that makes it a mainstream scientific discipline that is governed by its own distinctive principles in terms of interactions with cells and intravascular, transvascular and interstitial transport. This review focuses on the recent developments and understanding of the relationship between the shape of a nanoparticle and its navigation through different biological processes. It also seeks to illustrate that the shape of a nanoparticle can govern its in vivo journey and destination, dictating its biodistribution, intravascular and transvascular transport, and, ultimately, targeting of difficult to reach cancer sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available