4.7 Article

Determining molecular mass distributions and compositions of functionalized dendrimer nanoparticles

Journal

NANOMEDICINE
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 391-399

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.09.14

Keywords

dendrimer; EFTEM; energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy; gadolinium; mass measurement; scanning transmission electron microscopy; STEM

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering in the NIH
  2. Image Probe Development Center
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [ZIAHL005090] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [ZIAEB000006] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that a combination of unconventional electron microscopy techniques provides a quantitative means of assessing the degree of monodispersity of gadolinium (Cid) diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-conjugated polyamicloamine (PAMAM) dendrimers, which are designed for diagnostic imaging and delivering chemotherapeutics. Specifically, analysis of images acquired in the scanning transmission electron microscopy mode yields the distribution of molecular weights of individual dendrimers, whereas analysis of images acquired in the energy-filtering transmission electron microscopy mode yields the distribution of Gd atoms bound to the dendrimer nanoparticles. Measured compositions of Gd-conjugated G7 and G8 PAMAM dendrimers were consistent with the known synthetic chemistry. The G7 dendrimers had a mass of 330 +/- 4 kDa and 266 +/- 4 Gd atoms (standard error of the mean). The G8 dendrimers had a mass of 600 +/- 8 kDa and 350 +/- 5 Gd atoms (standard error of the mean). This approach will be particularly attractive for assessing the mass, composition and homogeneity of metal-containing organic nanoparticles used in nanomedicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available