4.8 Review

Energetic graphene oxide: Challenges and opportunities

Journal

NANO TODAY
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 137-152

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2012.02.003

Keywords

Combustion; Composite materials; Energetic materials; Fire risk; Graphene; Graphene oxide; Nanoparticles; Photothermal effects; Purification; Self-propagating reactions

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM)
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy
  3. National Science Foundation [SGER CMMI-0853573, DMRCAREER 0955612]
  4. Sony Corporation
  5. Northwestern University
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24681019] Funding Source: KAKEN
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Materials Research [0955612] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [12-530260] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by both its graphene-oriented applications and its own remarkable properties, interest in graphene oxide (GO) has widely spread across many disciplines. In parallel to the rapid progress of research, industrial-scale production of GO has emerged. GO is highly energetic, thermally unstable and can readily undergo exothermic disproportionation reactions to produce chemically modified graphene under mild heating conditions. This Review highlights the challenges and opportunities associated with GO's thermal instability such as the potential fire risk during large scale production and methods of mitigation, energy efficient way to reduce GO, photothermal patterning and sintering of graphene/polymer composites, and new syntheses using GO as an in situ power source to make nanoparticle decorated graphene composites for energy storage and catalysts. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available