4.8 Article

Different growth behaviors of ambient pressure chemical vapor deposition graphene on Ni(111) and Ni films: A scanning tunneling microscopy study

Journal

NANO RESEARCH
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 402-411

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-012-0221-6

Keywords

Graphene; scanning tunneling microscopy; chemical vapor deposition; grain boundary; nickel

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21073003, 20973013]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011CB921903, 2012CB921404]
  3. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of P.R. China [201087]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene growth on the same metal substrate with different crystal morphologies, such as single crystalline and polycrystalline, may involve different mechanisms. We deal with this issue by preparing graphene on single crystal Ni(111) and on similar to 300 nm thick Ni films on SiO2 using an ambient pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD) method, and analyze the different growth behaviors for different growth parameters by atomically-resolved scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and complementary macroscopic analysis methods. Interestingly, we obtained monolayer graphene on Ni(111), and multilayer graphene on Ni films under the same growth conditions. Based on the experimental results, it is proposed that the graphene growth on Ni(111) is strongly templated by the Ni(111) lattice due to the strong Ni-C interactions, leading to monolayer graphene growth. Multilayer graphene flakes formed on polycrystalline Ni films are usually stacked with deviations from the Bernal stacking type and show small rotations among the carbon layers. Considering the different substrate features, the inevitable grain boundaries on polycrystalline Ni films are considered to serve as the growth fronts for bilayer and even multilayer graphene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available