4.8 Article

In situ Study of Oxidative Etching of Palladium Nanocrystals by Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages 3761-3765

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl500670q

Keywords

Oxidative etching; liquid cell; electron microscopy; dissolution kinetics; diffusion layer

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51222202, 51372222, 61172011]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB932500]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT13037]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 281 [2014XZZX003-07, 2014FZA4007]
  5. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [10151064201000006]
  6. Pao Yu-Kong International Foundation for a Chair Professorship
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G070474/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/G070474/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative etching has widely prevailed in the synthesis of a crystal and played a critical role in determining the final growth behavior. In this Letter, we report an in situ microscopic study on the oxidative etching of palladium cubic nanocrystals by liquid cell scanning transmission electron microscopy. The etching was realized with oxidative radiation reactants from electron-water interaction in the presence of Br- ions. Dissolution dynamics of monodispersed and aggregated nanocrystals were both investigated and compared. Analyses on the dissolution kinetics of nanocrystals and the diffusion kinetics of the dissolved agents were carried out based on the scanning transmission electron microscopy characterizations. The results presented here pave a way toward the quantitative understanding of the oxidative etching reaction and its application in the functionally orientated fabrication of nanocrystals with certain sizes, structures, and morphologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available