4.8 Article

Boron Nitride-Graphene Nanocapacitor and the Origins of Anomalous Size-Dependent Increase of Capacitance

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 1739-1744

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl4037824

Keywords

Hexagon boron nitride; graphene; nanocapacitor; quantum capacitance; h-BN/graphene stacking heterostructure

Funding

  1. STARnet, a Semiconductor Research Corporation program - MARCO
  2. DARPA
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0969086] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1161163] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Office Of The Director
  8. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [0968405] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conventional wisdom suggests that decreasing dimensions of dielectric materials (e.g., thickness of a film) should yield increasing capacitance. However, the quantum capacitance and the so-called dead-layer effect often conspire to decrease the capacitance of extremely small nanostructures, which is in sharp contrast to what is expected from classical electrostatics. Very recently, first-principles studies have predicted that a nanocapacitor made of graphene and hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) films can achieve superior capacitor properties. In this work, we fabricate the thinnest possible nanocapacitor system, essentially consisting of only monolayer materials: h-BN with graphene electrodes. We experimentally demonstrate an increase of the h-BN films' permittivity in different stack structures combined with graphene. We find a significant increase in capacitance below a thickness of similar to 5 nm, more than 100% of what is predicted by classical electrostatics. Detailed quantum mechanical calculations suggest that this anomalous increase in capacitance is due to the negative quantum capacitance that this particular materials system exhibits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available