4.8 Article

Mitigating Voltage Fade in Cathode Materials by Improving the Atomic Level Uniformity of Elemental Distribution

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 2628-2635

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl500486y

Keywords

Layered structure; cation distribution; Ni-rich surface; spinel formation; voltage fade; lithium ion battery

Funding

  1. Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231, 18769]
  2. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program as part of the Chemical Imaging Initiative at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
  3. DOE's Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  4. DOE [DE-AC05-76RLO1830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium- and manganese-rich (LMR) layered-structure materials are very promising cathodes for high energy density lithium-ion batteries. However, their voltage fading mechanism and its relationships with fundamental structural changes are far from being well understood. Here we report for the first time the mitigation of voltage and energy fade of LMR cathodes by improving the atomic level spatial uniformity of the chemical species. The results reveal that LMR cathodes (Li[Li0.2Ni0.2M0.6]O-2) prepared by coprecipitation and sol-gel methods, which are dominated by a LiMO2 type R (3) over barm structure, show significant nonuniform Ni distribution at particle surfaces. In contrast, the LMR cathode prepared by a hydrothermal assisted method is dominated by a Li2MO3 type C2/ m structure with minimal Ni-rich surfaces. The samples with uniform atomic level spatial distribution demonstrate much better capacity retention and much smaller voltage fade as compared to those with significant nonuniform Ni distribution. The fundamental findings on the direct correlation between the atomic level spatial distribution of the chemical species and the functional stability of the materials may also guide the design of other energy storage materials with enhanced stabilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available