4.8 Article

Enhancement of Perovskite-Based Solar Cells Employing Core-Shell Metal Nanoparticles

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages 4505-4510

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl4024287

Keywords

Perovskites; thin-film solar cells; Au@SiO2 nanoparticles; exciton binding energy; free charge carriers

Funding

  1. EPSRC
  2. SUPERGEN SuperSolar project
  3. World Gold Council
  4. ERC through the ERC StG HYPER [279881]
  5. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Materials World Network [DMR-1008125]
  6. EPSRC [EP/G049653/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Materials Research [1008125] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G049653/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, inorganic and hybrid light absorbers such as quantum dots and organometal halide perovskites have been studied and applied in fabricating thin-film photovoltaic devices because of their low-cost and potential for high efficiency. Further boosting the performance of solution processed thin-film solar cells without detrimentally increasing the complexity of the device architecture is critically important for commercialization. Here, we demonstrate photocurrent and efficiency enhancement in mesosuperstructured organometal halide perovskite solar cells incorporating core shell Au@SiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) delivering a device efficiency of up to 11.4%. We attribute the origin of enhanced photocurrent to a previously unobserved and unexpected mechanism of reduced exciton binding energy with the incorporation of the metal nanoparticles, rather than enhanced light absorption. Our findings represent a new aspect and lever for the application of metal nanoparticles in photovoltaics and could lead to facile tuning of exciton binding energies in perovskite semiconductors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available