4.8 Article

Coherent Phonon-Grain Boundary Scattering in Silicon Inverse Opals

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 618-624

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl304190s

Keywords

Inverse opals; thermal conductivity; phonon transport; grain boundary

Funding

  1. AFOSR [AF FA9550-12-1-0073]
  2. U.S. Navy [N 66001-11-1-4154]
  3. National Science Foundation [NSF CBET09-54696 CAR]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0954696] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report measurements and modeling of thermal conductivity in periodic three-dimensional dielectric nanostructures, silicon inverse opals. Such structures represent a three-dimensional phononic crystal but affect heat flow instead of acoustics. Employing the Stober method, we fabricate high quality silica opal templates that on filling with amorphous silicon, etching and recrystallizing produce silicon inverse opals. The periodicities and shell thicknesses are in the range 420-900 and 18-38 nm, respectively. The thermal conductivity of inverse opal films are relatively low, similar to 0.6-1.4 W/mK at 300 K and arise due to macroscopic bending of heat flow lines in the structure. The corresponding material thermal conductivity is in the range 5-12 W/mK and has an anomalous similar to T-1.8 dependence at low temperatures, distinct from the typical similar to T-3 behavior of bulk polycrystalline silicon. Using phonon scattering theory, we show such dependence arising from coherent phonon reflections in the intergrain region. This is consistent with an unconfirmed theory proposed in 1955. The low thermal conductivity is significant for applications in photonics where they imply significant temperature rise at relatively low absorption and in thermoelectrics, where they suggest the possibility of enhancement in the figure of merit for polysilicon with optimal doping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available