4.8 Article

A Yolk-Shell Design for Stabilized and Scalable Li-Ion Battery Alloy Anodes

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 3315-3321

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl3014814

Keywords

Silicon nanoparticle; Li-ion battery; anode; yolk-shell; solid-electrolyte interphase; in situ TEM

Funding

  1. Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Batteries for Advanced Transportation Technologies (BATT) Program [6951379]
  3. Chevron Stanford Graduate Fellowship
  4. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  7. DOE's Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  8. DOE [DE-AC05-76RLO1830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Silicon is regarded as one of the most promising anode materials for next generation lithium-ion batteries. For use in practical applications, a Si electrode must have high capacity, long cycle life, high efficiency, and the fabrication must be industrially scalable. Here, we design and fabricate a yolk-shell structure to meet all these needs. The fabrication is carried out without special equipment and mostly at room temperature. Commercially available Si nanoparticles are completely sealed inside conformal, thin, self-supporting carbon shells, with rationally designed void space in between the particles and the shell. The well-defined void space allows the Si particles to expand freely without breaking the outer carbon shell, therefore stabilizing the solid-electrolyte interphase on the shell surface. High capacity (similar to 2800 mAh/g at C/10), long cycle life (1000 cycles with 74% capacity retention), and high Coulombic efficiency (99.84%) have been realized in this yolk-shell structured Si electrode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available