4.8 Article

Assessing Charge Carrier Trapping in Silicon Nanowires Using Picosecond Conductivity Measurements

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 3821-3827

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl3017835

Keywords

Silicon nanowires; solar cell; defect; surface passivation; terahertz spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Dutch organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. European Union Marie Curie Program [MEST-CT-2005-021000]
  3. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders, Belgium (IWT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Free-standing semiconductor nanowires on bulk substrates are increasingly being explored as building blocks for novel optoelectronic devices such as tandem solar cells. Although carrier transport properties, such as mobility and trap densities, are essential for such applications, it has remained challenging to quantify these properties. Here, we report on a method that permits the direct, contact-free quantification of nanowire carrier diffusivity and trap densities in thin (similar to 25 nm wide) silicon nanowires without any additional processing steps such as transfer of wires onto a substrate. The approach relies on the very different terahertz (THz) conductivity response of photoinjected carriers within the silicon nanowires from those in the silicon substrate. This allows quantifying both the picosecond dynamics and the efficiency of charge carrier transport from the silicon nanowires into the silicon substrate. Varying the excitation density allows for quantification of nanowire trap densities: for sufficiently low excitation fluences the diffusion process stalls because the majority of charge carriers become trapped at nanowire surface defects. Using a model that includes these effects, we determine both the diffusion constant and the nanowire trap density. The trap density is found to be orders of magnitude larger than the charge carrier density that would be generated by AM1.5 sunlight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available