4.8 Article

Direct Imaging of a Two-Dimensional Silica Glass on Graphene

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 1081-1086

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl204423x

Keywords

two-dimensional glass; 2D silica; SiO2; transmission electron microscopy; graphene imaging substrates; Zachariasen's model

Funding

  1. NSF through the Cornell Center for Materials Research (NSF) [DMR-1120296]
  2. National Science Foundation [DGE-0707428]
  3. DFG (German Research Foundation)
  4. Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts (MWK) of Baden-Wurttemberg
  5. Academy of Finland
  6. Max Planck Society, Germany
  7. Department of Science and Technology (DST), India
  8. EC [NMP3-SL-2011-266391]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large-area graphene substrates provide a promising lab bench for synthesizing, manipulating, and characterizing low-dimensional materials, opening the door to high-resolution analyses of novel structures, such as two-dimensional (2D) glasses, that cannot be exfoliated and may not occur naturally. Here, we report the accidental discovery of a 2D silica glass supported on graphene. The 2D nature of this material enables the first atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy of a glass, producing images that strikingly resemble Zachariasen's original 1932 cartoon models of 2D continuous random network glasses. Atomic-resolution electron spectroscopy identifies the glass as SiO2 formed from a bilayer of (SiO4)(2-) tetrahedra and without detectable covalent bonding to the graphene. From these images, we directly obtain ring statistics and pair distribution functions that span short-, medium-, and long-range order. Ab initio calculations indicate that van der Waals interactions with graphene energetically stabilizes the 2D structure with respect to bulk SiO2. These results demonstrate a new class of 2D glasses that can be applied in layered graphene devices and studied at the atomic scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available