4.8 Article

Arrays of Sealed Silicon Nanotubes As Anodes for Lithium Ion Batteries

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 1710-1716

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl100086e

Keywords

Lithium ion battery; silicon; nanotubes; anisotropic expansion

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Korean Ministry of Education, Science AMP
  2. Technology (MEST) in 2009 [K2070400000307A050000310]
  3. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [R31-2008-000-10092-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-00114] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Silicon is a promising candidate for electrodes in lithium ion batteries due to its large theoretical energy density. Poor capacity retention, caused by pulverization of Si during cycling, frustrates its practical application. We have developed a nanostructured form of silicon, consisting of arrays of sealed, tubular geometries that is capable of accommodating large volume changes associated with lithiation in battery applications. Such electrodes exhibit high initial Coulombic efficiencies (i.e., >85%) and stable capacity-retention (>80% after 50 cycles), due to an unusual, underlying mechanics that is dominated by free surfaces. This physics is manifested by a strongly anisotropic expansion in which 400% volumetric increases are accomplished with only relatively small (<35%) changes in the axial dimension. These experimental results and associated theoretical mechanics models demonstrate the extent to which nanoscale engineering of electrode geometry can be used to advantage in the design of rechargeable batteries with highly reversible capacity and long-term cycle stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available