4.8 Article

Probing a Century Old Prediction One Plasmonic Particle at a Time

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 1398-1404

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl100199h

Keywords

Surface plasmon resonance; Mie theory; single particle spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Nano-scale Science and Engineering Initiative of the National Science Foundation [EEC-0647452]
  2. Robert A. Welch Foundation [C-1664]
  3. 3M
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute [52005732]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 1908, Gustav Mie solved Maxwell's equations to account for the absorption and scattering of spherical plasmonic particles. Since then much attention has been devoted to the size dependent optical properties of metallic nanoparticles. However, ensemble measurements of colloidal solutions generally only yield the total extinction cross sections of the nanoparticles. Here, we show how Mie's prediction on the size dependence of the surface absorption and scattering can be probed separately for the same gold nanoparticle by using two single particle spectroscopy techniques, (1) dark-field scattering and (2) photothermal imaging. which selectively only measure scattering and absorption, respectively. Combining the optical measurements with correlated scanning electron microscopy furthermore allowed us to measure the size of the spherical gold nanoparticles. which ranged from 43 to 274 nm in diameter. We found that even though the trend predicted by Mie theory is followed well by the experimental data over a large range of nanoparticle diameters, for small size variations changes in scattering and absorption intensities are dominated by factors other than those considered by Mie theory. In particular, spectral shifts of the plasmon resonance due to deviations from a spherical particle shape alone cannot explain the observed variation in absorption and scattering intensities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available