4.8 Article

Nitrogen-Doped ZnO Nanowire Arrays for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 2331-2336

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl900772q

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UCSC
  2. UCEI [SC08-93]
  3. BES Division of the U.S. DOE [05ER4623A00]
  4. NSF of China [20628303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the rational synthesis of nitrogen-doped zinc oxide (ZnO:N) nanowire arrays, and their implementation as photoanodes in photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells for hydrogen generation from water splitting. Dense and vertically aligned ZnO nanowires were first prepared from a hydrothermal method, followed by annealing in ammonia to incorporate N as a dopant. Nanowires with a controlled N concentration (atomic ratio of N to Zn) up to similar to 4% were prepared by varying the annealing time. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies confirm N substitution at O sites in ZnO nanowires up to similar to 4%. Incident-photon-to-current-efficiency measurements carried out on PEC cell with ZnO:N nanowire arrays as photoanodes demonstrate a significant increase of photoresponse in the visible region compared to undoped ZnO nanowires prepared at similar conditions. Mott-Schottky measurements on a representative 3.7% ZnO:N sample give a flat-band potential of -0.58 V, a carrier density of similar to 4.6 x 10(18) cm(-3), and a space-charge layer of similar to 22 nm. Upon illumination at a power density of 100 mW/cm(2) (AM 1.5), water splitting is observed in both ZnO and ZnO:N nanowires. In comparison to ZnO nanowires without N-doping, ZnO:N nanowires show an order of magnitude increase in photocurrent density with photo-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of 0.15% at an applied potential of +0.5 V (versus Ag/AgCl). These results suggest substantial potential of metal oxide nanowire arrays with controlled doping in PEC water splitting applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available