4.8 Article

Charge Transfer Chemical Doping of Few Layer Graphenes: Charge Distribution and Band Gap Formation

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 4133-4137

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl902362q

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-98ER14861]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR-0349232, CHE-07-17518]
  3. Nanoscale Science and Engineering Initiative of the National Science Foundation [CRE-06-41523]
  4. New York State Office of Science, Technology, and Academic Research (NYSTAR)
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Chemistry [717518] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The properties of few layer (one layer (1 L) to four layer (4 L)) graphenes doped by adsorption and intercalation of Br-2 and I-2 vapors are investigated. The Raman spectra of the graphene G vibrations are observed as a function of the number of layers. There is no evidence for chemical reaction disrupting the basal plane pi electron conjugation. Adsorption of bromine on 1 L graphene creates a high doped hole density, well beyond that achieved by electrical gating with an ionic polymer electrolyte. In addition, the 2D Raman band is completely quenched. The 2 L bilayer spectra indicate that the doping by adsorbed 12 and Br-2 is symmetrical on the top and bottom layers. Br-2 intercalates into 3 L and 4 L graphenes. The combination of both surface and interior doping with Br-2 in 3 L and 4 L creates a relatively constant doping level per layer. In contrast, the G spectra of 3 L and 4 L with surface adsorbed I-2 indicate that the hole doping density is larger on the surface layers than on the interior layers and that I-2 does not intercalate into 3 L and 4 L. This adsorption-induced potential difference between surface and interior layers implies that a band gap opens in the bilayer type bands of 3 L and 4 L.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available