4.8 Article

Nanoscale Electronic Inhomogeneity in In2Se3 Nanoribbons Revealed by Microwave Impedance Microscopy

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 1265-1269

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl900222j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center of Probing the Nanoscale (CPN)
  2. Stanford University
  3. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
  4. DOE [DE-F003-01ER45929-A001, DE-FG36-08GOI8004]
  5. NSF NSEC [PHY-0425897]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Driven by interactions due to the charge, spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom, nanoscale inhomogeneity has emerged as a new theme for materials with novel properties near multiphase boundaries. As vividly demonstrated in complex metal oxides (see refs 1-5) and chalcogenides (see refs 6 and 7), these microscopic phases are of great scientific and technological Importance for research In high-temperature superconductors (see refs 1 and 2), colossal magnetoresistance effect (see ref 4), phase-change memories (see refs 5 and 6), and domain switching operations (see refs 7-9). Direct Imaging on dielectric properties of these local phases, however, presents a big challenge for existing scanning probe techniques. Here, we report the observation of electronic inhomogeneity In Indium selenide (In2Se3) nanoribbons (see ref 10) by near-field scanning microwave Impedance microscopy (see refs 11-13). Multiple phases with local resistivity spanning 6 orders of magnitude are Identified as the coexistence of superlattice, simple hexagonal lattice and amorphous structures with similar to 100 nm inhomogeneous length scale, consistent with high-resolution transmission electron microscope studies. The atomic-force-microscope-compatible microwave probe Is able to perform a quantitative subsurface electrical study in a noninvasive manner, Finally, the phase change memory function in In2Se3 nanoribbon devices can be locally recorded with big signals of opposite signs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available