4.6 Article

Generating Daily Synthetic Landsat Imagery by Combining Landsat and MODIS Data

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 24002-24025

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s150924002

Keywords

spatial and temporal data fusion; remote sensing; MODIS; Landsat; FROM-GLC

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301390]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2014AA06A511]
  3. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China [2013CB733405, 2010CB950603]
  4. National Science and Technology Major Project of China
  5. Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Program [2010AD004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Owing to low temporal resolution and cloud interference, there is a shortage of high spatial resolution remote sensing data. To address this problem, this study introduces a modified spatial and temporal data fusion approach (MSTDFA) to generate daily synthetic Landsat imagery. This algorithm was designed to avoid the limitations of the conditional spatial temporal data fusion approach (STDFA) including the constant window for disaggregation and the sensor difference. An adaptive window size selection method is proposed in this study to select the best window size and moving steps for the disaggregation of coarse pixels. The linear regression method is used to remove the influence of differences in sensor systems using disaggregated mean coarse reflectance by testing and validation in two study areas located in Xinjiang Province, China. The results show that the MSTDFA algorithm can generate daily synthetic Landsat imagery with a high correlation coefficient (R) ranged from 0.646 to 0.986 between synthetic images and the actual observations. We further show that MSTDFA can be applied to 250 m 16-day MODIS MOD13Q1 products and the Landsat Normalized Different Vegetation Index (NDVI) data by generating a synthetic NDVI image highly similar to actual Landsat NDVI observation with a high R of 0.97.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available