4.0 Review

Classification of Rhizoctonia spp. using rDNA-ITS sequence analysis supports the genetic basis of the classical anastomosis grouping

Journal

MYCOSCIENCE
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 93-114

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10267-007-0394-0

Keywords

binucleate; ceratobasidium; multinucleate; tulasnella; uninucleate

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, rDNA-ITS sequence analysis seems to be the most appropriate method for comprehensive classification of Rhizoctonia spp. Our previous review article was concerned with detailed analysis of multinucleate Rhizoctonia (MNR), and the current review complements the previous one with detailed analysis of binucleate Rhizoctonia (BNR) (teleomorphs: Ceratobasidiium spp. and Tulasnella spp.) and uninucleate Rhizoctonia (UNR) (teleomorph: C. bicorne). Data of all the appropriate BNR and UNR accumulated in GenBank were analyzed together in neighbor-joining (NJ) trees supplemented with percent sequence similarity within and among the anastomosis groups (AGs) and subgroups. Generally, the clusters of the isolate sequences supported the genetic basis for the AG based on hyphal fusion anastomosis. Comprehensive interrelationships among all the currently available MNR, BNR, and UNR groups and subgroups in Gen Bank were subsequently analyzed in NJ and maximum-parsimony (MP) trees, showing the genetic relatedness among the different groups and indicating possible bridging groups between MNR, BNR, and UNR. The review also indicates serious inaccuracies in designation of sequences of some isolates deposited in GenBank. Several additional teleomorph genera with Rhizoctonia spp. anamorphs have also been reported in the literature. However, as they have not been intensively studied, there were no available data on their rDNA-ITS sequences that could be included in this review.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available