4.5 Article

Current Challenges in the Microbiological Diagnosis of Invasive Aspergillosis

Journal

MYCOPATHOLOGIA
Volume 178, Issue 5-6, Pages 403-416

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-014-9763-3

Keywords

Invasive aspergillosis; Diagnosis; Galactomannan; beta-1, 3-D-Glucan; PCR; Lateral flow

Categories

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [MS09/00055]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis is challenging because no sufficiently sensitive or specific tests have been developed to date. Infection can only be confirmed using histology, although this approach is unavailable in many patients. Therefore, diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis is based on a combination of the presence of host factors, radiological and clinical findings, and mycological criteria. In clinical practice, lack of optimal diagnostics often leads to empirical therapy and great cost and toxicity. Mycological criteria include the isolation of Aspergillus from clinical samples or the detection of biomarkers in fluids. Culture is cheap and easy and enables the identification of fungi and performance of antifungal susceptibility testing; however, it has low sensitivity and specificity. Non-culture-based diagnosis is based on the detection of fungal biomarkers such as galactomannan or (1 -> 3)-beta-d-glucan in normally sterile body fluids. These procedures enable faster and more sensitive and specific detection of Aspergillus; however, diagnostic accuracy is affected by the patient's underlying condition. Finally, while detection of Aspergillus DNA is promising, the lack of standardization limits its inclusion as a mycological criterion for the definition of probable invasive aspergillosis. New diagnostic procedures based on lateral flow technology are also promising but need further evaluation. In the present review, we discuss current culture-based and non-culture-based procedures for the microbiological diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available