4.2 Article

Pseudorhizidium is a new genus with distinct zoospore ultrastructure in the order Chytridiales

Journal

MYCOLOGIA
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages 496-507

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3852/12-269

Keywords

chytrid; Chytridiomycetes; discharge; morphology; taxonomy; zoospore

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science grants [REVSYS DEB-00949305, MRI DEB-0500766]
  2. NSF-AFTOL [DEB-0228668]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology [0949305] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A chytrid isolate (JEL 221) we identified as the rarely reported species, Rhizidium endosporangiatum Karling, was cultured axenically for the first time. The purposes of this study are to characterize the developmental morphology of isolate JEL 221 and to elucidate its zoospore ultrastructural features. Thallus development and morphology of isolate JEL 221 are characteristic of R. endosporangiatum as it was originally described. However, thallus morphology of R. endosporangiatum is not entirely typical of the genus Rhizidium, especially that of the type R. mycophilum. The presence of an endosporangium, a layer of material encapsulating the edges of the protoplast protruding through multiple discharge pores, makes this a distinctive species. Consistent with its published molecular-based phylogenetic placement, we found that isolate JEL 221 shared ultrastructural features with the two major zoospore types described for the Chytridiales but had distinct zoospore architecture. A new genus, Pseudorhizidium, is erected for this chytrid based on its thallus morphology, molecular phylogenetic placement and unique zoospore ultrastructure. This new genus does not fit into either of the described families (Chytridiaceae or Chytriomycetaceae) in the Chytridiales because of its unique zoospore ultrastructure, especially the two-layered nature of the electron-opaque plug in the base of the flagellum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available