4.2 Article

Conservation of biotrophy in Hygrophoraceae inferred from combined stable isotope and phylogenetic analyses

Journal

MYCOLOGIA
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages 280-290

Publisher

ALLEN PRESS INC
DOI: 10.3852/10-195

Keywords

Cuphophyllus; ecology; Gliophorus; Humidicutis; Hygrocybe; Hygrophorus; nutritional status

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-0843278, IOS-0843366]
  2. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [0843278] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nutritional modes of genera in Hygrophoraceae (Basidiomycota: Agaricales), apart from the ectomycorrhizal Hygrophorus and lichen-forming taxa, are uncertain. New delta N-15 and delta C-13 values were obtained from 15 taxa under Hygrophoraceae collected in central Massachusetts and combined with isotopic datasets from five prior studies including a further 12 species using a data standardization method to allow cross-site comparison. Based on these data, we inferred the probable nutritional modes for species of Hygyophorus, Hygrocybe, Humidicutis, Cuphophyllus and Gliophorus. A phylogeny of Hygrophoraceae was constructed by maximum likelihood analysis of nuclear ribosomal 28S and 5.8S sequences and standardized delta N-15 and delta C-13 values were used for parsimony optimization on this phylogeny. Our results supported a mode of biotrophy in Hygrocybe, Humidicutis, Cuphophyllus and Gliophorus quantitatively unlike that in more than 450 other fungal taxa sampled in the present and prior studies. Parsimony optimization of stable isotope data suggests moderate conservation of nutritional strategies in Hygrophoraceae and a single switch to a predominantly ectomycorrhizal life strategy in the lineage leading to Hygrophorus. We conclude that Hygrophoraceae of previously unknown nutritional status are unlikely to be saprotrophs and are probably in symbiosis with bryophytes or other understory plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available