4.2 Article

Puccinia striiformis f.sp tritici presents high diversity and recombination in the over-summering zone of Gansu, China

Journal

MYCOLOGIA
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages 44-53

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3852/08-098

Keywords

effective size; linkage disequilibrium; parasexuality; survival; wheat (stripe) yellow rust

Categories

Funding

  1. European BIOEXPLOIT [FOOD-CT-2005-513959]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB100203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici (PST), a basidiomycota responsible for wheat yellow rust, has a strict Clonal behavior and a low genetic diversity in European and Australian populations. On the other hand high diversity has been reported in Chinese populations. Moreover it is thought that in China yellow rust. epidemics start recurrently from the western highlands where over-summering Occurs. To compare PST genetic diversity in this area to the one described in France seven AFLP primer combinations were used to analyze a sample of 160 isolates collected in 2001 in five counties of Gansu Province. The AFLP data revealed 40 polymorphic bands, discriminating 139 AFLP genotypes. Linkage disequilibrium and phylogeographic analyses Support the hypothesis of a reproductive mode that is not strictly clonal. In this regard Chinese isolates front Gansu strongly contrast with the European Studies using the same markers. Genetic diversity of this 1 y sampling in Gansu is found to be seven times higher than the one observed in France over 20 y and exhibits lower linkage disequilibrium. The effective Population size of the French sample was estimated to be 1000 times smaller than the Gansu Population. These results support the hypothesis of large population size as well as the occurrence of genetic recombination, while the importance of Gansu as a main over-summering area requires assessment through larger scale studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available