4.1 Article

Genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of the formulated insecticide Aficida® on Cnesterodon decemmaculatus (Jenyns, 1842) (Pisces: Poeciliidae)

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.08.018

Keywords

Carbamates; Mortality; Micronuclei; Erythrocyte:erythroblast ratios; Fish; Pirimicarb

Funding

  1. National University of La Plata [11/N564]
  2. National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion [BID 1728/OC-AR-PICT 2004 26116]
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET), Argentina [PIP 0106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The acute toxicity, genotoxicity, and cytotoxicity of the pirimicarb-containing commercial-formulation carbamate insecticide Aficida (R) (50% pirimicarb) were evaluated on Cnesterodon decemmaculatus (Pisces, Poeciliidae) exposed under laboratory conditions. Micronucleus (MN) induction as well as alterations in the erythrocytes:erythroblasts ratios were employed as end-points for genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, respectively. Cr(VI) and cyclophosphamide were used as positive controls for the toxicity and geno-cytotoxicity assays, respectively. Mean values of 344.3 and 225.5 mg Aficida (R)/L were determined for LC-50(24h), and LC-50(96h), respectively. In 48 h-exposed fish, a MN increase was found in Aficida (R)-treated fish in the 50-157 mg/L concentration range. When fish were exposed to Aficida (R) for 96h. only those animals treated at 50-100 mg/L showed an increase in MN frequency. Cellular cytotoxicity, revealed by a decreased proportion of circulating erythrocytes and an enhancement of erythroblasts, was found after 48 h of exposure in 50-157 mg Aficida (R)/L-treated fish, while, after 96 h exposure, only 100-157 mg Aficida (R)/L induced the same effect. This species provides a useful experimental model for the biomonitoring of aquatic ecosystems. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available