4.1 Article

8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine generated in the earthworm Eisenia fetida grown in metal-containing soil

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.05.011

Keywords

Eisenia fetida; 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine; cadmium; mutagenicity; reactive oxygen species

Funding

  1. Foundation for Earth Environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heavy metal pollution of soil causes biological problems, such as mutagenicity to living organisms, including human beings. However, few methods have been developed to assess metal mutagenicity in soil. To avoid metal mutagenicity, an adequate bio-monitoring method is required. In the present study, to determine if the analysis of oxidative DNA damage generated in the earthworm is a useful bio-monitoring method for soil mutagenicity. the accumulation of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), a major form of oxidative DNA damage, in Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826) treated with cadmium chloride (CdCl(2)) or nickel chloride (NiCl(2)) was analyzed. E fetida was treated with Cd (10 or 200 mu g/g soil) or Ni (10 or 200 mu g/g soil) for 1, 2, and 3 weeks or 3 months. After metal exposure, the metal concentration in E fetida was analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry and the 8-OH-dG accumulated in E. fetida was analyzed by HPLC analyses and immunohistochemistry. Atomic absorption spectrometry revealed that Cd, but not Ni, accumulated within E. fetida. The 8-OH-dG levels in the DNA of E. fetida treated with Cd for 3 months were significantly higher than those in control E. fetida. Moreover, immunohistochemical analyses revealed that positive signals for 8-OH-dG accumulation in seminal vesicles were detected only in E. fetida treated with 10 mu g of Cd for 3 months. Although some points remain unresolved, a bio-monitoring system analyzing the DNA damage generated in the earthworm might be useful for the assessment of the mutagenicity of soil contaminated with various heavy metals, such as Cd. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available