Journal
MUTAGENESIS
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 427-432Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mutage/get018
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [SFRH/BD/46929/2008, PTDC/SAU-ESA/102367/2008]
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-ESA/102367/2008, SFRH/BD/46929/2008] Funding Source: FCT
Ask authors/readers for more resources
DNA damage is commonly measured at the level of individual cells using the so-called comet assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis). As the frequency of DNA breaks increases, so does the fraction of the DNA extending towards the anode, forming the comet tail. Comets with almost all DNA in the tail are often referred to as hedgehog comets and are widely assumed to represent apoptotic cells. We review the literature and present theoretical and empirical arguments against this interpretation. The level of DNA damage in these comets is far less than the massive fragmentation that occurs in apoptosis. Hedgehog comets are formed after moderate exposure of cells to, for example, H2O2, but if the cells are incubated for a short period, hedgehogs are no longer seen. We confirm that this is not because DNA has degraded further and been lost from the gel, but because the DNA is repaired. The comet assay may detect the earliest stages of apoptosis, but as it proceeds, comets disappear in a smear of unattached DNA. It is clear that hedgehogs can correspond to one level on a continuum of genotoxic damage, are not diagnostic of apoptosis and should not be regarded as an indicator of cytotoxicity.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available