4.1 Article

Assessment of the genotoxic potential of indirect chemical mutagens in HepaRG cells by the comet and the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assays

Journal

MUTAGENESIS
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 555-560

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geq039

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Agency of Research [06SEST17]
  2. European Commission [COMICS-STREP 037575]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many chemical carcinogens require metabolic activation to form genotoxic compounds in human. Standard in vitro genotoxicity assays performed with activation systems, such as rat liver S9, are recognised to lead to a high number of false positives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of differentiated human hepatoma HepaRG cells as an in vitro model system for the detection of DNA damage induced by promutagens using the comet and the cytokinesis- block micronucleus assays. Several promutagens were tested, including aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), benzo[a] pyrene (B[a] P), acrylamide, N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), cyclophosphamide (CPA), 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b] pyridine (PhIP) and 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f] quinoline (IQ). Cytotoxicity of these compounds was assessed by measuring lactate dehydrogenase leakage. A 24 h exposure was generally needed to obtain an obvious positive response in differentiated HepaRG cells in the comet and in the cytokinesis- block micronucleus assays. Comet formation was observed with all compounds except IQ. B[a] P, CPA and AFB1 showed a dose-dependent increase in micronucleated cells, whereas no increase was observed with PhIP, IQ and acrylamide. These preliminary data on genotoxicity in differentiated HepaRG cells are promising but more chemicals must be tested to determine the ability of HepaRG cells to assess genotoxicity of chemicals in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available