Journal
MUSCLE & NERVE
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 822-825Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mus.22226
Keywords
Becker muscular dystrophy; CGH; inversion mutation; MLPA; SCAIP
Categories
Funding
- NIH [R01 NS043264]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The use of hybridization-based methods for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) mutation analysis is increasingly common. We report a case of Becker muscular dystrophy in which discrepant results between a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based single-condition amplification/internal primer (SCAIP) and a comparative genomic hybridization assay incompletely characterized the mutation (an inversion of exons 23 and 24). These results demonstrate the limits of sensitivity and specificity of both tests, and highlight the need for more detailed analysis when intronic deletions are detected by comparative genome hybridization methods. Muscle Nerve 44: 822-825, 2011
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available