4.4 Article

PRECLINICAL DRUG TRIALS IN THE mdx MOUSE: ASSESSMENT OF RELIABLE AND SENSITIVE OUTCOME MEASURES

Journal

MUSCLE & NERVE
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 591-602

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mus.21211

Keywords

Duchenne muscular dystrophy; mdx mouse; preclinical trials; statistical analysis; phenotyping; muscle function tests; exercise; echocardiography

Funding

  1. NIH/NICHD [K12 CHRCDA K12HD001399-04]
  2. Department of Defense USAMRAA [W81XWH-05-1-0616]
  3. Foundation to Eradicate Duchenne, Inc.
  4. Muscular Dystrophy Association
  5. Charley's Fund
  6. NIH [1U54HD053177-01A1, R01-AR050478]
  7. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [K12HD001399] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [U54HD053177] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR050478] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The availability of animal models for Duchenne muscular dystrophy has led to extensive preclinical research on potential therapeutics. Few studies have focused on reliability and sensitivity of endpoints for mdx mouse drug trials. Therefore, we sought to compare a wide variety of reported and novel endpoint measures in exercised mdx and normal control mice at 10, 20, and 40 weeks of age. Statistical analysis as well as power calculations for expected effect sizes in mdx preclinical drug trials across different ages showed that body weight, normalized grip strength, horizontal activity, rest time, cardiac function measurements, blood pressure, total central/peripheral nuclei per fiber, and serum creatine kinase are the most effective measurements for detecting drug-induced changes. These data provide an experimental basis upon which standardization of preclinical drug testing can be developed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available