4.4 Article

CLINICAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS DISTINGUISHING ACUTE-ONSET CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY DEMYELINATING POLYNEUROPATHY FROM ACUTE INFLAMMATORY DEMYELINATING POLYNEUROPATHY

Journal

MUSCLE & NERVE
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 202-207

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mus.21480

Keywords

acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; clinical predictors; electrophysiology; sural sparing

Funding

  1. Talecris Biotherapeutics
  2. Bourse McLaughlin du Doyen de l'Universite Laval
  3. Royal College of Physician and Surgeon Traineeship Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Up to 16% of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients may present acutely. We performed a retrospective chart review on 30 acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDIP) and 15 acute-onset CIDIP (A-CIDP) patients looking for any clinical or electrophysiological parameters that might differentiate AIDP from acutely presenting CIDP. A-CIDP patients were significantly more likely to have prominent sensory signs. They were significantly less likely to have autonomic nervous system involvement, facial weakness, a preceding infectious illness, or need for mechanical ventilation. With regard to electrophysiological features, neither sural-sparing pattern, sensory ratio >1, nor the presence of A-waves was different between the two groups. This study suggests that patients presenting acutely with a demyelinating polyneuropathy and the aforementioned clinical features should be closely monitored as they may be more likely to have CIDIP at follow-up. Muscle Nerve 41: 202-207, 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available