4.4 Article

INCREASED EXPRESSION OF ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORS IN THE DIAPHRAGM MUSCLE OF MDX MICE

Journal

MUSCLE & NERVE
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages 1585-1594

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mus.21183

Keywords

nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; upregulation; dystrophin; muscular dystrophy; mdx mouse

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The absence of dystrophin in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and in the mutant mdx mouse causes muscle degeneration and disruption of the neuromuscular junction. Based on evidence from the denervation-like properties of these muscles, we assessed the ligand-binding constants of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and the mRNA expression of individual subunits in membrane preparations of diaphragm muscles from adult (4-month-old) and aged (20-month-old) control and mdx mice. The concentration of nAChRs as determined by the maximal specific [I-125]-alpha-bungarotoxin binding (Bmax) in the muscle membranes did not change with aging in both animal strains. When compared to age-matched control groups, the Bmax in mdx muscles was increased by 65% in adults, and by 103% in aged mice with no alteration of toxin affinity for nAChRs. Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assays showed that mRNA transcripts for the nAChR alpha 1, gamma, alpha 7, and beta 2, but not the epsilon subunits, were more abundant in mdx than in control muscles. The results indicate increased expression of extrajunctional nAChRs in the mdx diaphragm and reflect impairment of nAChR regulation in dystrophin-deficient muscles. These observations may be related to the resistance to nondepolarizing muscle relaxants and the high sensitivity to depolarizing agents reported in DMD patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available