4.3 Article

Season of infectious mononucleosis and risk of multiple sclerosis at different latitudes; the EnvIMS Study

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 669-674

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458513505693

Keywords

vitamin D; Epstein-Barr virus; latitude; interaction; Multiple sclerosis; seasons

Funding

  1. Italian MS Society/Foundation (Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM)) [2007/R/14, 2008/R/19]
  2. Western Norway Regional Health Authority (Helse Vest) Norway [911421/2008, 911474/2009]
  3. University of Bergen, Norway
  4. Norwegian MS society
  5. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Seasonal fluctuations in solar radiation and vitamin D levels could modulate the immune response against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and influence the subsequent risk of multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: Altogether 1660 MS patients and 3050 controls from Norway and Italy participating in the multinational case-control study of Environmental Factors In Multiple Sclerosis (EnvIMS) reported season of past infectious mononucleosis (IM). Results: IM was generally reported more frequently in Norway (p=0.002), but was associated with MS to a similar degree in Norway (odds ratio (OR) 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64-2.73) and Italy (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.17-2.52). For all participants, there was a higher reported frequency of IM during spring compared to fall (p<0.0005). Stratified by season of IM, the ORs for MS were 1.58 in spring (95% CI 1.08-2.31), 2.26 in summer (95% CI 1.46-3.51), 2.86 in fall (95% CI 1.69-4.85) and 2.30 in winter (95% CI 1.45-3.66). Conclusions: IM is associated with MS independently of season, and the association is not stronger for IM during spring, when vitamin D levels reach nadir. The distribution of IM may point towards a correlation with solar radiation or other factors with a similar latitudinal and seasonal variation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available