4.3 Article

Time to secondary progression in patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with first generation immunomodulating drugs

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 765-774

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458512463764

Keywords

Disease-modifying drugs; disease progression; disease severity; epidemiology; multiple sclerosis; relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; Sweden; time to progression

Funding

  1. Swedish
  2. Gothenburg Multiple Sclerosis Societies
  3. Bayer Schering Pharma
  4. Biogen Idec
  5. Novartis
  6. Sanofi-Aventis
  7. BiogenIdec
  8. Merck-Serono
  9. Bayer-Schering
  10. Teva
  11. Swedish Research Council
  12. Gothenburg Societies of the Neurologically Disabled

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It is currently unknown whether early immunomodulatory treatment in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) can delay the transition to secondary progression (SP). Objective: To compare the time interval from onset to SP in patients with RRMS between a contemporary cohort, treated with first generation disease modifying drugs (DMDs), and a historical control cohort. Methods: We included a cohort of contemporary RRMS patients treated with DMDs, obtained from the Swedish National MS Registry (disease onset between 1995-2004, n = 730) and a historical population-based incidence cohort (onset 1950-64, n = 186). We retrospectively analyzed the difference in time to SP, termed the period effect within a 12-year survival analysis, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. Results: We found that the period affected the entire severity spectrum. After adjusting for onset features, which were weaker in the contemporary material, as well as the therapy initiation time, the DMD-treated patients still exhibited a longer time to SP than the controls (hazard ratios: men, 0.32; women, 0.53). Conclusion: Our results showed there was a longer time to SP in the contemporary subjects given DMD. Our analyses suggested that this effect was not solely driven by the inclusion of benign cases, and it was at least partly due to the long-term immunomodulating therapy given.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available