4.3 Article

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of beta-amyloid metabolism in multiple sclerosis

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 543-552

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458512460603

Keywords

Amyloid beta; amyloid precursor protein; APP metabolism; biomarkers; cerebrospinal fluid; multiple sclerosis; natalizumab; mitoxantrone; relapsing-remitting MS; secondary progressive MS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Amyloid precursor protein (APP) and amyloid beta (A beta) peptides are intensely studied in neuroscience and their cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measurements may be used to track the metabolic pathways of APP in vivo. Reduced CSF levels of A beta and soluble APP (sAPP) fragments are reported in inflammatory diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS); but in MS, the precise pathway of APP metabolism and whether it can be affected by disease-modifying treatments remains unclear. Objective: To characterize the CSF biomarkers of APP degradation in MS, including the effects of disease-modifying therapy. Methods: CSF samples from 87 MS patients (54 relapsing-remitting (RR) MS; 33 secondary progressive (SP) MS and 28 controls were analyzed for sAPP and A beta peptides by immunoassays, plus a subset of samples was analyzed by immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry (IP-MS). Patients treated with natalizumab or mitoxantrone were examined at baseline, and after 1-2 years of treatment. Results: CSF sAPP and A beta peptide levels were reduced in MS patients; but they increased again towards normal, after natalizumab treatment. A multivariate model of IP-MS-measured A beta species separated the SPMS patients from controls, with RRMS patients having intermediate levels. Conclusions: We confirmed and extended our previous observations of altered CSF sAPP and A beta peptide levels in MS patients. We found that natalizumab therapy may be able to counteract the altered APP metabolism in MS. The CSF A beta isoform distribution was found to be distinct in SPMS patients, as compared to the controls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available