4.3 Article

Vitamin D status and antibody levels to common viruses in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 666-671

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458510394398

Keywords

cytomegalovirus; Epstein-Barr virus infections; herpes simplex; multiple sclerosis; risk factors; vitamin D

Funding

  1. National MS Society
  2. National Institutes of Health [NIH K23NS067055, NIH RR015577, AI082714, AR053483]
  3. National Multiple Sclerosis Science
  4. Nancy Davis Foundation
  5. National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The relative contribution and interaction of risk factors for multiple sclerosis (MS) have not been evaluated. Objectives: To determine whether vitamin D status is associated with antibody levels to common viruses in pediatric-onset MS or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients and controls. Methods: We assessed whether vitamin D status was associated with viral antibody levels to Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 or -2 in subjects who demonstrated evidence of remote infection with these viruses and whether these associations differed depending on disease status. Results: In 140 subjects, vitamin D status was weakly associated with antibody levels to CMV but not to the other viruses. However, there were some interactions between vitamin D status and disease state. Among those with vitamin D sufficiency (>= 30 ng/ml), MS/CIS patients had higher antibody levels to Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen-1 than controls. Vitamin D sufficiency was associated with higher CMV antibody levels in MS/CIS subjects but lower CMV antibody levels in controls. Higher vitamin D levels appeared to be associated with higher titers to HSV-2 in MS/CIS patients but not controls. Conclusions: Vitamin D status may be differentially associated with antibody levels to common childhood viruses among seropositive subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available